<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wire-Free Protection Limited &#187; third party accreditation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.w-fp.co.uk/tag/third-party-accreditation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.w-fp.co.uk</link>
	<description>Wireless, radio and wired fire alarms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fire Alarms &#8211; Seen and not heard?</title>
		<link>http://www.w-fp.co.uk/blog/audibility/fire-alarms-seen-and-not-heard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.w-fp.co.uk/blog/audibility/fire-alarms-seen-and-not-heard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decibel levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party accreditation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w-fp.co.uk/blog/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that within the history of our industry, the sound levels of systems were not paid the attention that they now get.  I remember working for a large fire company that considered the need for an audibility test extra to commissioning the fire alarm, the implications of which was that it was often not an option that was taken up by the clients.  The result of which is that lots of sites with perfectly good fire alarm systems will find that they are not noisy enough to meet the standards....]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.w-fp.co.uk/blog/audibility/fire-alarms-seen-and-not-heard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

